the appearance of this blog - and only for having opened a blog, not for its content - a few friends responded by accusing me of breaking the "neo-exhibitionism." This is not some irritated me, but I was immediately driven to make public my contempt for these positions, which are way of life for the so-called "pure and hard ', a predominantly male and, unfortunately, located predominantly in the left that thin is still worthy of that status. Therefore, restricting ourselves to examine the specific case, what exactly defends those who condemn the use of a contemporary medium that has no history of vehicles passed, but in return offers a much more agile? First of all, at least at the most healthy, the nobility of cases which is an implicit implementation of overexposure compared to the results, which can be said of every revolutionary action in history. Also Guy Debord, in the mid-fifties, distributed free of his "Potlatch" expecting a response in people's minds, and an acknowledgment that he could not exactly verify. Today, however, this way of practicing the disagreement with the company in danger of drowning in the icon, suffering from a lack of reality is equivalent to that of the company that raises the same dissent. Today, for example, the world anarchist living in close contact (almost exclusively) of his fellow, is inevitably a sectarian world, specialized, that is idling. On the one hand, a world and a style omogenizzanti the word, writing, dissemination tools, etc. used. The other, an innocent world for its autoghettizzazione. Others think that everyone really up their own minds and the desire to spread their ideas "by any means necessary"! Nonsense! Even the burden on anarchism gratuità se una disciplina lo condiziona. E, a maggior ragione, se questa gli impedisce di interagire con la merda che ci troviamo intorno. Chi, avendo letto i testi che sono nel mio blog, ha disapprovato che fossero blog e non brochure militante mi ha suggerito la moralità e la specialità al posto della libera amoralità della convinzione individuale; mi ha indicato l'autonomia dell'atto di ripulirsi la coscienza (quale lo scrivere quei testi, consegnandoli a una diffusione per forza marginale) al posto dell'opportunità di inoltrare del pensiero diverso proprio nei circuiti della società che contestiamo. Ma questa opportunità, nuova, contemporanea, senza storia gloriosa e, per giunta, condivisa con gli attuali professionisti of sublimation, is a real opportunity, a means of working, can pollute pollution, which does not seem the same thing that screwed wide open doorways. Sure, I could communicate my fellow anarchists anarchism adottrinale through the press off, but you know what they are not the problem. There's just be pissed off because they can not send mail or blog coordinates, ie for the pure-durismo making them harmless, in fact. As against the tireless work of those who have ideas and acts as if he had we can not afford to be harmless, it can not offer them the vestiges of a dream that would not be able to recognize. For this, my pure and hard of my ass, I do not convince! In fact, I think you've come to the same terminus of human balls Ferrer, and through no fault of an era that brought you into the wild in the minority, but in the minority because you put yourself, not accepting that is part of the dialectic the same culture that defend. Why do you close in front of a scenario, of course, would imply more trouble than you want. Your pure-durismo, I have already said, has a noble cause, because romantic conscience. But how can you associate it with the fixity and representation? Pure-durismo of those who only look at the past, who is defending the door or vinyl wrist watches automatic or do things just like I am not surprised, of course. E 'escape the masculine from reality altogether. But you, mon leftist, it seems unnatural that the right woman, black right, the union of the right. Apart from the fact that consistency could really be the virtue of fools (at least in a subject that is not formed spontaneously as a function of his desire), your consistency, mount leftist, I feel even worse: it seems the show, which is always the austerity of the intellectual. We are the misery of Franco Fortini, translating Zazie in the Metro, wrote "CINS blue" instead of "blue jeans", as if to distance themselves from this harmful product of consumerism stars and stripes, or some bottegoscurino who claimed they could not even deliver word "jazz", especially as he was gut-wrenching that musicaccia so desire. But meanwhile, we saw well what all this has brought.
0 comments:
Post a Comment